Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work
Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights whilst respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided from the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking in the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
fourteen. From the light in the position explained over, it's concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be considered for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the duration of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case files may be accessed from the public access terminals during the clerk’s office from the court where the case was filed.
Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends within the specifics of each and every case, such as any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation involves the names of your parties to the original case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it was decided, and also the book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
In almost any society, the enforcement of regulation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the most really serious crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is important to make certain justice prevails.
Section 302 in the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
This case has actually been cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, as well as the rule of legislation.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Except if case is attempted(Bail Matters)
Because of this, simply citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held by the august check here Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--